Along almost identical lines to the the Philosophers of Rock shirts, another example of low- and high-brow meeting in a hipster bar and saying “wouldn’t it be cool if…”
Available from the Cinefile Video store and the IFC New York

via YMFY
Scott McCloud’s TED talk from 2005 prompted me to write an essay about the redundancy of the page model for reading text on computer screen, as you do. But there’s plenty more it could have prompted me to write about.
There’s a bit, starting around here, that’s quite philosophical, looking understanding the shape of the future based on knowledge of what has been. He labels this a Formalist approach and boils it down to four basic principles:
While I often fall on the fourth I like to think I’ve done well by following the first three.
via “no, not that one” Jim Cameron
Richard Feynman is so much better at explaining this stuff that the likes of Dawkins.
This is taken from a BBC Horizon program from 1981, The Pleasure Of Finding Things Out, in which Feynman pretty much talks to the camera for 50 minutes. It’s one of the best pieces of television ever. You can watch it in full here.
Ostensibly an article encouraging technology geeks to look outside their disciplines, this makes a strong argument for why children shouldn’t simply be taught skills for the workplace but should be taught how to think. Philosophy, or at least critical reasoning, should be taught on an equal footing with English and Maths.
I see a humanities degree as nothing less than a rite of passage to intellectual adulthood. A way of evolving from a sophomoric wonderer and critic into a rounded, open, and engaged intellectual citizen. When you are no longer engaged only in optimizing your products—and you let go of the technotopian view—your world becomes larger, richer, more mysterious, more inviting. More human.